pencilbinsearchuserminuscrosspluscheckarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-downarrow-upinfofile-emptylocationlocation2languagepauseplayopacityhideshow

ヘルプ

About the OTP and the data on the site

1.    Where does the data come from?

The OTP compiles information about forest operations from three sources: government agencies, logging companies and third-party organizations.

(1) Government agencies in producer countries provide details on forest concessions, such as geographic boundaries, forest concession names, initial year of exploitation, as well as the names of the registered logging companies that operate in forest concessions within their country. This is largely drawn from data compiled in the Forest Atlases.

(2) All of the registered logging companies operating in producer countries are listed on the OTP website. These companies are then able to voluntarily register their profile and upload key documents to demonstrate compliance with the legal framework of the country that they operate in.

(3) Third-party organizations include independent monitors (IMs), both mandated or nonmandated, as well as other civil society groups and nongovernment organizations at the local and international level. These organizations are able to upload observations of suspected noncompliance, provided that they are supported by evidence. In some cases, observations are validated by an official reading committee. See our section below on IMs to find out more about how they operate.

(4) Data from Global Forest Watch on forest cover and tree cover loss over time as well as on protected areas. This data also includes weekly Global Land Analysis and Discover (GLAD) tree cover loss alerts.

2.    How accurate is the data in the OTP?

For the data submitted by companies, the OTP has put in place a two-step validation process, where an initial review of the submissions is conducted to ensure that the content is legible, of sufficient quality and categorized correctly. This is followed by a secondary review to verify the content and the quality of the information provided. Company documents are also reviewed by external experts periodically.

For the data submitted by third-party organizations, there are two levels of quality control. First, WRI staff and local partners from IM organizations review the completion of the submission (forms must include evidence and correct legal references). This is followed by a secondary review, where the content of the submission is reviewed, and comments to improve the quality of the submission are sent back to the IM organization.

WRI and its partners strive to keep the website up to date as much as possible, however we cannot guarantee that the data on the site is up to date at the time of access.

WRI is not liable for any inaccuracies with the data available on the Open Timber Portal. To find out more, please take a look at our Terms of Service.

3.    How is the transparency ranking calculated?

To make data on the OTP easily accessible and understandable for users, companies are ranked on the basis of their level of voluntary disclosure. For each producer, a transparency score is calculated based on the percentage of documents shared on the OTP out of the total number of documents requested.

4.    What’s an “IM” or independent monitor and what do they do?

An independent monitor (“IM”) is a non-governmental organization that analyzes and reports on forest governance and management, as well as the harvest and transport of timber. The FLEGT VPA process creates an explicit role for IMs to oversee implementation of the agreement and verify compliance in the producer country.

Usually, when mandated, the IM works under an agreement with the host country government. Its findings are in many countries validated by a reading committee that includes donors and other stakeholders, typically chaired by the national forest authority.

Within the OTP, mandated IMs can enter instances of suspected noncompliance by companies and/or by government actors. These observations will need to be validated by the reading committee before they can be published on the OTP website.

Nonmandated IMs can be NGOs and civil society organizations that work on forest protection and community rights but do not have an official agreement with the government of the country to conduct missions to monitor the implementation of the FLEGT VPAs.

Observations from nonmandated IMs can be uploaded by these organizations directly onto the OTP website. These are then reviewed for validation by WRI staff and local partners.

5.    How is the severity of observations/infractions calculated?

To assist OTP users in understanding the relative importance or severity of an observation on illegal logging or a forest governance problem, WRI and its partners have developed severity parameters for each observation category in collaboration with IMs.

Take a look at the Assessing severity of observations section, which will provide an in-depth explanation on how the severity parameters used were defined.

6.    How often is the data updated?

Companies and third-party organizations are regularly uploading new information on the OTP.

7.    What are GLAD alerts?

While the data from Global Forest Watch displays tree cover loss over time, GLAD alerts provide information on tree clearings as they happen. Alerts are updated weekly and allow for near-real time data on tree cover loss. For more information on the GLAD alerts, go to https://glad.geog.umd.edu/.

8.    What is the difference between the OTP and other tools that support due diligence (SPOTT, Timber Trade Portal, NEPCON Sourcing Hub and BVRio)?

In collaboration with the organizations that have created these tools, we have developed a joint flyer that provides a brief description of each of these tools and their geographical focus. You can also access these directly from our Tools and Resources section.

9.    Will the OTP expand to other countries?

The OTP will eventually be adaptable to and deployed in any country that manages natural forest areas through long-term forest management concessions. Currently, the OTP contains data about forest operations in the DRC, Congo and Cameroon. Data on forest operations in Gabon and CAR will be released on the OTP by the end of 2020.

Observations of suspected infractions submitted by third-party organizations, however, are not limited to any specific country and users will be able to access data from around the globe.

10. Can I download the data from the OTP website?

The OTP does not allow users to download company profiles or observations from third-party organizations, however, all documents published on the website can be individually accessed and downloaded.

寄せられる質問

1.    ウェブサイトに関する詳細や質問はどこに問い合わせればよいですか?

オープン・ティンバー・ポータル(Open Timber Portal)の情報に関してご不明な点がございましたら、opentimberportal@wri.orgまでお問い合わせください。

2.    OTPの使用方法について知りたいのですが、どこに問い合わせればよいですか?

OTPのウェブサイト全体を紹介し、さまざまな機能を説明する紹介ビデオが用意されています。こちらからご覧いただけます。


-      透明性に関するランキングページの紹介は2:52からご覧ください

-      生産業者のプロフィールの仕組みについては、5:22からご覧ください

-      第三者機関がアップロードした観察結果の詳細については、12:11からご覧ください

3.    OTPを使うにはアカウントが必要ですか?

OTPは無料で利用でき、ユーザーはコンテンツを利用するためにアカウントを作成する必要はありません。アカウント作成が必要なのは、データの提供を希望する生産業者と第三者機関のみです。

4.    OTPサイトに生産業者として登録し、自分のアカウントにアクセスするにはどうすればよいのでしょうか?

OTPの対象国で活動する生産業者で、現在ウェブサイトに掲載されていない会社は、ウェブサイト上で生産業者として登録する必要があります。生産業者新規登録のページにアクセスし、手順に従って生産業者登録を行ってください。

OTPサイトに掲載されると、登録ページでアカウントを作成することができます。

アカウントの設定方法、書類のアップロード方法、関連するお問い合わせなど、より詳細な情報については、生産業者向けチュートリアル・ファクトシートをご覧ください。

5.    私は生産業者です。どの書類をアップロードする必要があるかをどのように確認できますか?

生産業者が事業を展開している国ごとに、OTPサイトにアップロードできる国別文書のリストが表示されます。さらに、生産業者は文書の有効開始日と予定される有効期限を明記する必要があります。

6.    OTPサイトに情報をアップロードしたいと考えている第三者機関です。どのように行えますか?

OTPへの参加を希望する第三者機関は、同プラットフォームを通じて登録申請を行う必要があります。ログインページから「登録」を選択し、フォームに必要事項を入力してください。

OTPチームによるリクエストが承認されると、登録フォームで選択したユーザー名とパスワードで、同じウェブサイトにログインできるようになります。

アカウントの設定方法、観察結果の作成、関連する問い合わせなど、より詳細な情報については、独立したモニター向けチュートリアル・ファクトシートをご覧ください。

7.    私は生産業者ですが、プロフィールに記載されている内容に問題があります。

お客様の会社概要に記載されている内容は、すべてOTPスタッフによって確認されていますが、会社概要に記載されている内容に関して別途問題がある場合は、opentimberportal@wri.orgまでご連絡ください。